Akash Deep Under Fire for Physical Contact with Ben Duckett After Fiery Oval Test Dismissal

Akash Deep's Send-Off to Ben Duckett Ignites Cricket Code Debate

Cricket’s code of conduct isn’t often front-page news, but Akash Deep’s move after dismissing Ben Duckett in the fifth Test between England and India has everyone talking. Walk into any cricket chat right now and you'll hear about one thing: the moment Deep, after finally getting Duckett out on 43, wrapped an arm around his rival and exchanged words all the way to the pavilion.

This wasn’t just a pat on the back—you could feel the energy. Duckett had been unorthodox and confident at the crease, earlier taunting Deep with the line, “You can't get me out here,” and dispatching him with fearless shots, including a cheeky reverse ramp. So when Deep finally sent Duckett packing, emotions spilled over.

It didn’t sit well with many. The live commentary box was abuzz. Ravi Shastri, never shy with opinions, pointed straight at the ICC rulebook, stressing that cricket is a non-contact sport for good reason. He warned, “[This is] the kind of action that can push things over the edge. If you don’t curb it, the match referee has to step in, and things can get ugly.” Michael Atherton wasn’t far behind, insisting that match officials should act upfront to stop larger issues from erupting later—basically, nip it in the bud before the heat rises.

The Fine Line Between Passion and Sanction

The Fine Line Between Passion and Sanction

On paper, what Akash Deep did may look minor—just a moment between two fired-up athletes. But ICC’s rules are crystal clear: any unnecessary or inappropriate physical contact is out of bounds, even if it feels good-natured or celebratory. Cricket might get emotional, especially in a high-stakes Test series, but there are rules to keep things in check.

If the match referee—armed with slow-motion replays and the ICC’s code—decides the contact was out of order, Deep could be hit with a Level 1 or 2 penalty. That means fines, suspension points, or possibly missing a match. These are the kind of sanctions that can change a career's narrative, even if briefly.

But here’s the wrinkle: on the field, this didn’t look hostile, more like a release of pressure after a long duel. Still, intent is tough to judge from the stands, and rules exist for clarity. Deep’s send-off, playful or not, got people asking whether cricket’s fierce competitiveness is starting to overshadow basic respect. The last thing the ICC wants is a snowball effect—one little scuffle leading to a full-blown feud.

And just when the spotlight seemed brightest on Deep’s behavior, he swung it with his bat. Sent in as a nightwatchman, he put critics on mute with a gutsy, career-best 66—reminding everyone that skill talks loudest. In an instant, the story shifted from code breaches to cricketing brilliance, showing how quickly fortunes turn in this game.

What stays, though, is the bigger question. Where should the line be drawn between bravado and outright breach? For now, Akash Deep awaits his fate on the ICC’s desk, and players everywhere are watching closely—each with their own take on competitiveness, respect, and the boundaries that keep cricket from boiling over.

Harper Maddox

Harper Maddox

I'm a professional sports journalist and tennis aficionado based in Wellington. My work predominantly involves writing about tennis tournaments globally, analyzing game strategies, and staying abreast with the latest trends in the industry. I love delving deep into the dynamics of tennis games and presenting insightful analyses to my readers. Apart from work, I enjoy spending time with my family, cooking up a storm in the kitchen, and heading out for scenic hikes.

Write a comment

wave

Press ESC to close